Secret Group
Manipulates Vote Machines
BEXCLUSIVE TO AMERICAN FREE PRESS
By Christopher Bollyn
The mid-term elections have been described
as "revolutionary" due to the unusual success of
Republican candidates while a president from the same party
occupied the White House.
However, the upset election results that heralded the Republican
revolution have been accompanied by a credibility gap because
of the historic devolution in how Americans cast their votes.
As a result of the 2000 election fiasco in Florida, expensive
electronic voting machines have replaced paper ballot voting
systems in a growing number of jurisdictions across the United
States.
However, the electronic touch-screen voting and ballot-counting
machines lack the transparency and credibility of hand-counted
paper ballots.
Furthermore, troubling revelations about the people who are
invested in the companies that make these voting machines
raise a host of serious questions about the condition of the
democratic franchise in the United States.
The companies that design, build, and operate most of the
voting machines currently being used are privately held and
secretive. Before the 2000 elections, when this reporter tried
to learn who owned Omaha-based Electronic Systems Software
(ES&S), the largest voting machine company in the United
States, the information was simply not available.
ES&S, whose motto is "Better elections every day,"
claims to have counted 100 million ballots in the 2000 election
and 56 percent of the vote in the last four presidential elections.
However, company officials have repeatedly refused to discuss
the security of their voting machines or divulge who owns
and directs the company.
Two independent writers, Bev Harris of Talion.com and journalist
Lynn Landes of EcoTalk.org, have investigated the voting machine
companies operating in the United States and discovered a
number of political connections to the Republican Party and
a well-know senator from Nebraska.
According to Nebraska's Elections Office, ES&S is the
only voting machine company certified to count votes in the
state. A small percentage of the vote in Nebraska is still
hand-counted.
ES&S was formed in 1997 by a merger of Omaha based American
Information Systems (AIS) and Dallas based Business Records
Corp. (BRC). BRC was partially owned by Cronus Industries,
a company with connections to the Hunt brothers from Texas,
as well as other individuals and entities, including Rothschild,
Inc.
In 1997, American Information Systems was an unincorporated,
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Omaha World-Herald Company
according to a Department of Justice press release about the
merger of AIS with BRC. American Information Systems' 1996
sales in all of its product lines were about $14.3 million.
Nebraska-born Charles T. "Chuck" Hagel moved to
Omaha in 1992 to become chairman of AIS and the McCarthy Group,
a private investment bank, Harris told AFP.
AIS was the voting machine company that counted the votes
by which Hagel was elected to the Senate in 1996. Hagel had
only resigned as CEO of AIS in 1995.
Josh Denney, spokesman for Sen. Hagel's Washington office,
told AFP that Hagel had been chairman of the board at AIS
"for about a year." Denney said that Hagel had resigned
from the AIS board on March 15, 1995, but had continued to
serve as president of McCarthy and Co., until 1996.
Today, Hagel has investments in the renamed McCarthy Group
worth between $1 million and $5 million, according to documents
published by Harris on her web site.
Because the McCarthy Group reportedly owns some 35 percent
of ES&S, Harris has raised the matter of Hagel's investment
in a company that counts the votes in Nebraska. Omaha World-Herald
reportedly owns about 45 percent of ES&S.
Lawyers representing ES&S have recently asked Harris to
remove the documents and information from her web site. Harris,
however, has not removed the material, saying that voters
need to know who owns the companies that make voting machines
to avoid any possible conflict-of-interest issues.
Two brothers, Bob and Todd Urosevich, founded AIS in the 1980s.
Today Bob is president of Diebold Election Systems, while
Todd is a vice president at ES&S.
Georgia became the first state in the country to implement
a uniform statewide computerized touch-screen voting system.
The Diebold system was sold to voters in Georgia as a "state-of-the-art
system" that is "more accurate, convenient and accessible
to voters."
The electronic touch-screen system does not provide a verifiable
paper trail, which degrades the credibility of the results.
--------------------------------------------------------------
- A question of Identity by Beny Irzanto - Pacific
Rim 2010 by Hatmadita Ramuny
- Liberal Imperialism by Justin Raimondo
- Letter: A 'Great Nation' by Frank Gubasta
- Secret group manipulates vote machines by
Christopher Bollyn
- Militant Patriotism and America's Jihad
by Matthew Riemer
- Thoughts on Thanks(taking)giving Day by
Frank Gubasta
- Challenges facing sustainable development
in the next 20 years by Choo Zheng Xi
- Why The Chicken Crossed the Road!
- On invading Iraq: less talk, more
unity by Alexander M. Haig, Jr.
- Violence and Islam by Charles Krauthammer
- The Arab Role by Amir Taheri
- The War on Freedom: How and Why America was
Attacked September 11, 2001
- The Myths that prevent a real
Palestinian peace
- September 11 and other conspiracy theories
- Anti-Flag, 911 For Peace (song lyric)
- Unicwash.org petition
|