| I ‘m very passionate in the
HARMONY movement or you can call it the Spiritual & Love
movement. As a society we need to wake up the young people
like my children to help them to appreciate life and be thankful
for what we have so far and that is a stable, secure and prosperous
Singapore.
Many years ago, I was involved in dialogue and was interviewed
by a journalist about IRCCs.
1. Let me share with you what had happened to the religious
dialogue that I attended: -
“Keep Religion Out”
Several participants made it plain that they thought religion
had no place in the school curriculum. For many of them, it
was better to teach civics.
Businesswoman Sunflower Chong Sun Wah, a single parent, said
it was not yet time for Singaporeans to focus on religion
when they had not yet fostered a sense of nationhood.
It was important to bridge racial differences and learn each
other's values first, she said. Roman Catholic priest and
moral education specialist Robert Balhetchet, who has long
been against the teaching of religion in schools said that
religious teaching was the job of parents and religious organizations.
Agreeing, educationist Zaibun Siraj said it was unfair to
leave some religious out, as was the case with the present
religious knowledge course. She felt that
civics, on the other hand, was better way of promoting good
citizenship.”
2. Here are some letters to the Straits Times 13 August 1989.
“Proposal To Scrap RK Welcomed”
I read with interest the Government parliamentary Committee
for Education’s proposal to scrap Religious knowledge as a
compulsory subject in secondary
schools.
As an atheist, I welcome the proposal. I would like to draw
your readers’ attention to what Bertrand Russell said about
teaching religious knowledge and civics in school he ran in
the United States in the late 1920s.
He said: “With regards to religion there is no religious
teaching of any sort or kind. The children learn about the
various religious of the world as historical facts, but no
one religion is treated differently from any other.”
“As for teaching the brotherhood of man, I have the same
objections that I have to explicit moral instruction in that
it tends to produce either hypocrisy or rebellion. Morality
must grow, it cannot be implanted by precept.”
R. ASOKAN”
“Make Religious Studies Part Of ECA”
I STRONGLY disagree with Madam Chong Sun Wah’s comment that
it is not yet time for Singaporeans to focus on religion when
they had not yet fostered a sense of nationhood (Sunday Times,
13 August 1989).
If now is not the time to focus on religion, when will the
time be?
Students have been taught civics from primary 1 to secondary
2 and I think that they have learned enough.
School is not just a place where students just study but
also a place where they can learn to be better.
Religious studies serve this purpose.
Living in this modern world, I think that it is essential
to learn to be tolerant of other faiths and to live in harmony
with other races. For example, Buddhism teaches us to live
in harmony with all, regardless of race or religion, while
Confucian Ethics teaches filial piety. Both have practical
relevance in our daily lives.
Wouldn’t it be better to make Religious Knowledge an ECA
rather than take it off the curriculum?
ALLEN KOO TECK CHYE
3. My Reply To Mr Koo Teck Chye but not published:
The Essence Of Education - Teaching Values
Dear Mr Koo Teck Chye,
Allow me to take the liberty of introducing myself.
My name is Chong Sun Wah. I am an ordinary Singaporean of
Chinese origin, without any paper qualification except born
with lot of common sense, guts, confidence and determination
to voice out my concerned for Singapore’s future.
I believe our leaders may not help future generations if
they introduce religion as a study in schools.
In case my motive is misunderstood, I want you to know that
I believe in God. I just do not want the Government to introduce
religious studies in Singapore
to create more confusion or unnecessary problems where the
presence of racial problems still exists.
It is my belief that the way to lasting happiness, stability
and unity in our people is to search within ourselves to find
out where our true values lie? Do we really understand the
significant of our existence in this world? What we really
want our future to be as Singaporean? What is our proper function
as a citizen?
I can’t really agree with the statement that Singapore had
succeeded. When Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yuan has stepped down
(I mean really step down) and the PAP party still united and
stick together than I believe Singapore don’t need any religious
studies which will complicate our stability?
I believe what we really need is to work on developing a
comprehensive and concise Universal Spiritual Education by
transforming Singapore’s pragmatic
society into an artistic society, thus the Government must
make art part of life.
Without doubt, political stability and economic prosperity
do lead us to the heights of success, but the defeat is that
they are also fraught with attendant social problems and imperfection,
because heartless Singaporeans are there-by produced. They
show little concern for others except for personal advancement
and greed. Besides, their avarice desire know no bounds, should
this unhealthy behavior become our life style for the next
25 years, just imagine what will the behaviors and metal outlook
of our children, I won’t dare imagine!
Can’t we do something in time to put the matter right, instead
of complicating it by introducing religious studies in all
schools. Is it by introducing religious
knowledge then we can have beautiful children? If we have
a Universal Religion then I would encourage the Government
to implement it. Maybe we should look into such a possibility?
What is going to be the universal religion to hold as together
as One People, One Nation and One World?
My Belief
There is one religion
The religion of LOVE
There is one caste
The caste of HUMANITY
There is one language
The language of the HEART
There is one God
He is OMNIPRESENT
Yours sincerely,
Mdm Chong Sun Wah
|